Accessibility settings

Published on in Vol 8 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/70305, first published .
Woman speaking to a temi robot in a modern office setting

Evaluating Social Assistive Robots in Clinical Nursing Care: Mixed Method Pilot Study on Health Care Workers’ Perceptions and Adoption

Evaluating Social Assistive Robots in Clinical Nursing Care: Mixed Method Pilot Study on Health Care Workers’ Perceptions and Adoption

Journals

  1. Meldgård L, Øllgaard J, Palinko O, Lee M, Clemmensen T. Exploring Service Robots as Resources for Occupational Well-Being at Hospitals in Denmark and South Korea. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2026:1 View
  2. Blavette L, Dacunha S, Bondarenko A, Piccoli M, Rigaud A, Pino M. Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on usefulness, acceptability and implementation conditions of socially assistive robots in France: a cross-sectional survey and cluster analysis. Frontiers in Digital Health 2026;8 View
  3. Igoumenidis M, Velonaki V. AI and Its Shifting Roles in the Therapeutic Relationship: Implications for Precision Medicine. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2026;16(6):324 View
  4. Müller N, Islertas E, Ebert D, Schmidt A, Wilhelm D. Enhancing trust in healthcare robotics: implications derived from medical professionals’ perspectives. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 2026 View
  5. Kimani R. Care ethics and the transformation of care in an age of artificial intelligence. BMC Medical Ethics 2026;27(1) View
  6. Orehovački T. The HEART Framework for LLM-Enabled Socially Assistive Robots in Healthcare: A PRISMA-Informed Structured Review. Applied Sciences 2026;16(16):7904 View
  7. Yuan Z, Jang W. Modeling the Tech-Emotion Paradox in Nursing Homes: A Robot-Caregiver-Resident Framework and Serial-Parallel Mediation Model. International Journal of Social Robotics 2026;18(6) View
  8. Osypka K, Dziechciaz M, Suwalska A, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, Tobis S. Clinical employment and nursing students’ attitudes towards a humanoid social robot in geriatric care: implications for the public health workforce. Frontiers in Public Health 2026;14 View
  9. Lee Y, Hsu F, Chen S, Chu S, Yang C, Liu F, Lien A. Factors Associated With Pediatric Health Care Professionals’ Intention to Adopt Socially Assistive Robots: Mixed Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2026;28:e105501 View
  10. Rayo J, Shen L, Truong D, Kitnikone S, Fritz R, Wung S. A Humanoid Companion Robot in Residential Memory Care: Staff Perspectives During Early Implementation. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 2026;52(10):5 View
  11. Huang Z, Duan X, Ma L, Yang W, Wang R, Zhu G, Wang W, Li J, Wang Z, Zhang S. Robot-assisted cognitive assessment with eye-tracking. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2026;116:104073 View
  12. Raß E, Unbehaun D, Lenz G, Fischer A, Thiel K, Luessem J, Wulf V. The Interplay of Socially Assistive Robots, Multiprofessional Structures and Social Dynamics in Care Facilities – Reflections and Lessons Learned from a Long-Term Ethnographic Study. ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare 2026 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Cheng Y, Chi Z. Design, User Experience, and Usability. View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Toma A. Proceedings of the 34th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. Modeling Relational Dynamics into Cognitive Architectures for Socially Assistive Robots View
  2. Herbert A, Chen Y, Wang H, Pham M, Han Z. 2026 IEEE 35th International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). Understanding Dentists' and Patients' Perspectives on Dentistry Robots: An Exploratory Study in Dentist-Patient-Robot Interaction View